In this blog, we explore the key differences between PRP vs GFC to help you make an informed decision about which treatment may suit your hair restoration goals best.
Hair thinning and hair loss can be emotionally challenging and often lead people to search for reliable, non-surgical solutions. Two popular treatments in regenerative hair therapy are Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) and Growth Factor Concentrate (GFC). While both use the body’s natural healing abilities to stimulate hair follicles, they differ in technology, preparation, effectiveness, and application.
1. PRP vs GFC: Understanding the Basics
Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP):
PRP therapy begins with a simple blood draw. The blood is then placed in a centrifuge to separate out platelet-rich plasma, which is rich in growth factors that support tissue healing and regeneration. This concentrated plasma is injected into the scalp to stimulate dormant hair follicles and promote natural hair growth.
Growth Factor Concentrate (GFC):
GFC is a more advanced and refined treatment compared to PRP. It involves isolating only the most potent growth factors from your blood using a specialized system, removing unwanted cells like white and red blood cells. The result is a purer, more concentrated formula that’s injected into the scalp for quicker and more noticeable results.
2. PRP vs GFC: Efficacy and Visible Results
PRP Treatment Results:
Usually requires 4 to 6 sessions over a span of several months.
Best suited for individuals in the early stages of hair thinning.
Results may take time and vary depending on age, lifestyle, and genetics.
Some patients report a visible improvement in hair density and quality after 2-3 months.
GFC Treatment Results:
Requires fewer sessions—typically 2 to 3 for noticeable improvement.
More effective in moderate to advanced hair loss cases due to higher concentration of active growth factors.
Patients often see results faster, sometimes as early as 4 to 6 weeks.
Enhanced follicular activation may lead to thicker, healthier hair regrowth.
3. PRP vs GFC: Procedure, Discomfort, and Downtime
PRP Procedure:
Blood is centrifuged to separate platelet-rich plasma.
Injections can cause mild discomfort, often due to the presence of white blood cells, which may trigger slight inflammation.
Procedure takes around 30–45 minutes, with minimal downtime. Most people return to work the same day.
GFC Procedure:
Uses a sterile, closed-system kit to isolate only growth factors.
White and red blood cells are completely removed, reducing inflammation and discomfort.
The injection process is smoother and gentler on the scalp.
Downtime is similarly minimal, with faster recovery and less post-treatment sensitivity.
4. PRP vs GFC: Cost, Availability, and Accessibility
PRP Therapy Cost & Access:
More affordable, with sessions priced around ₹3,000 to ₹6,000.
Available in most dermatology and aesthetic clinics across India.
A good starting point for those on a budget-conscious hair restoration journey.
GFC Therapy Cost & Access:
Higher cost per session, generally ranging from ₹6,000 to ₹10,000.
Fewer sessions required may balance out the total cost over time.
Offered mainly in advanced clinics with the necessary equipment and trained professionals.
Though slightly costlier, many consider it worth the investment due to faster and more targeted results.
Conclusion: PRP vs GFC – Which Should You Choose?
When it comes to PRP vs GFC, both treatments offer non-surgical, natural options for combating hair loss. PRP is ideal for those with mild hair thinning who are looking for a more cost-effective and well-established solution. GFC, being the newer and more advanced version, is better suited for those with noticeable hair loss or for individuals seeking faster and more dramatic results.
Ultimately, the choice between PRP vs GFC should be based on the severity of hair loss, budget, timeline for visible results, and clinic availability. It is always advisable to consult a certified dermatologist or hair restoration expert to determine the most suitable treatment plan for your hair goals.