Introduction
In search of celebrity-worthy hair care, you may have wondered whether top stars are turning away from hair transplants and embracing QR 678 hair treatment instead for Hair loss. Marketed as a non-surgical hair regrowth solution powered by growth factors, QR 678 promises to revive thinning hair—without the invasiveness of surgery. In this post, we’ll explore what exactly QR 678 is, how it stacks up against other hair fall therapies, and whether it’s the game-changer celebrities and influencers are opting for.
What Is QR 678 Hair Treatment?
QR 678 is a non-surgical hair regrowth therapy typically administered via mesotherapy injections into the scalp. Its formula contains a cocktail of growth factors and polypeptides, such as IGF-1, VEGF, bFGF, KGF, thymosin β4, and copper tripeptide—key players in stimulating hair follicle activation and encouraging transition from the resting (telogen) phase to the growth (anagen) phase.
Developed in India and holding patents in India and the United States, QR 678 is promoted as FDA-approved (though not FDA-cleared in the U.S.) and supports over 80–90% efficacy in patient trials, often touted as being far more cost-effective than hair transplants
Clinical Evidence & Treatment Protocol
A key study compared QR 678 to PRP (platelet-rich plasma) in treating male pattern baldness (androgenetic alopecia). After eight sessions spaced 3–4 weeks apart, patients treated with QR 678 showed a significant reduction in hair fall (confirmed via pull tests) and notable improvement in hair density and shaft thickness—outperforming the PRP cohort. These results held up even after one year of follow-up.PMC
Treatment sessions are typically brief (around 5–15 minutes), minimally invasive, and may require 8–12 sittings for optimal results—an attractive alternative for those wanting to avoid the recovery and cost associated with transplants
Celebrity Appeal (and Reality Check)
There’s growing buzz that QR 678 offers a more accessible route to fuller hair than a transplant. However, no verified reports confirm celebrities are favoring QR 678 over transplants. Its rising popularity online may influence perception, but no media sources confirm star endorsements.
Perspectives from Real Users & the Reddit Community
Reddit threads paint a mixed picture:
“I did 4 sessions. Initially, there was success but it’s like PRP only.”Reddit
“Looks like the biggest bullshit scam I’ve ever seen.”Reddit
“Doctor here… honestly it seems like a scam… QR 678 itself is just some amino acids and polypeptides you can get in any vitamin pill.”Reddit
“It has a dedicated site URL… they claim FDA approval yet I can’t find any human trials…”Reddit
On the positive side:
“it helped me… hairs are more dense… more advanced than PRP.”Reddit
So while some users are enthusiastic about improved density, others question its value and authenticity.
Quick Comparison Table
| Feature | QR 678 Treatment |
| Mode of Action | Growth factor and peptide injections (mesotherapy) |
| Efficacy vs. PRP | Reportedly superior, with sustained results |
| Number of Sessions | 8–12 sessions over several weeks |
| Procedure Nature | Minimally invasive, outpatient |
| Cost | Less expensive than transplant, but varies by clinic |
| User Sentiment | Mixed—some see growth, others skeptical or disappointed |
Final Thoughts
QR 678 offers a compelling, non-surgical alternative for hair regrowth, harnessing growth factor technology to stimulate follicles with relatively minimal downtime. Yet, while it’s gaining traction and highly marketed (with promising clinical data), there’s no confirmed evidence celebrities prefer it to transplants, and user experiences remain divided.
If you’re exploring celebrity hair fall solutions and want something less invasive than surgery, QR 678 could be worth exploring—with the caveat that results may vary, and a qualified dermatologist’s guidance is crucial.
If you’re exploring celebrity hair fall solutions and want something less invasive than surgery, QR 678 could be worth exploring—with the caveat that results may vary, and a qualified dermatologist’s guidance is crucial.